Cast your Vote

Posted 1 week(s) ago
Was '28 Years Later: The Bone Temple' a good movie?

Posted 1/16/2026

Directed by Nia DaCosta, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple is a haunting middle chapter that pivots from visceral survivalism to gothic horror. Set in a fractured Britain nearly three decades after the initial outbreak, the story follows young Spike, who is abducted by the "Jimmies," a sadistic survivor cult led by the monstrous Sir Jimmy Crystal. The narrative centers on Dr. Kelson (Ralph Fiennes), an enigmatic figure maintaining a northern stronghold where he has constructed the titular "Bone Temple"—a massive, ritualistic monument built from the skulls of the dead. This setting illustrates a world where society hasn’t just collapsed; it has mutated into something calculated and grotesque, proving that the vacuum left by civilization is often filled by institutionalized cruelty rather than simple lawlessness.

The film’s true terror lies in the "evolution of rage" and the moral decay of the survivors. Dr. Kelson’s bizarre bond with an "Alpha" infected named Samson suggests the virus is gaining a dark intelligence, complicating the struggle for the British Isles. As Jim (Cillian Murphy) returns to bridge the gap between the original outbreak and this new era, the film explores the "inhumanity of the rational." It shifts the focus from the fear of being hunted to the horror of what humans become to maintain order. By examining whether survival is worth the loss of one's soul, The Bone Temple serves as a grim meditation on the cost of endurance, perfectly setting the stage for the trilogy’s final reckoning.

Static sparkle image Movie descriptions were generated by Google Gemini.





Was '28 Years Later: The Bone Temple' a good movie?
  • Terrible
  • Below Average/Not Good
  • Average
  • Good
  • Excellent

Please note that once your vote has been cast, it cannot be changed!

You have to be logged in to vote
You can't comment until you're logged in

Real Votes. Real Results. Real-Time.